Frequently asked questions

​

Why do most family wealth transfers fail?

Wealth transfer failures stem predominantly from soft issues, not investment performance. The Williams Group’s 20-year study of 3,250 families identified the precise breakdown of causes: 60 per cent of failures trace to communication and trust breakdown within the family, 25 per cent to inadequately prepared heirs, 10 per cent to the absence of a shared family mission or purpose, and only 5 per cent to other factors such as legal, tax, or professional failure (Williams Group, 2003). The critical insight is that the great majority of wealth transfer failures originate within the family system itself, not the banking or advisory system. This means the solutions are largely in the family’s own hands. While the “70 per cent lose control of their assets by the second generation” headline is widely cited, Grubman (2022) shows it is simply the inverse of the 30 per cent second-generation business-continuity rate in John Ward’s 1987 study of 200 Illinois manufacturers, a single narrow study that conflates business survival with family wealth transfer. Recent research by Owner.One (2024) surveying 13,500 founders across 18 countries found a 34 per cent average loss rate, significantly lower. Yet Bordier & Cie’s own 182-year survival and fifth-generation family ownership shows that, with deliberate governance and preparation, multi-generational wealth transfer is not only possible but enduring.

​

What is a family constitution or family charter?

A family charter is a formalised written document that outlines your family’s guiding principles, values, mission and vision, alongside the rules for managing shared wealth and making decisions about governance and succession. Unlike legal documents such as wills or trusts, a family charter is not binding but serves as a framework for clarity and alignment. It typically addresses succession planning, ownership guidelines, inheritance distribution, communication protocols, the family’s approach to philanthropy and values, and mechanisms for resolving disputes. By establishing expectations before they are needed, a family charter reduces conflict and keeps family purpose aligned across generations.

​

When should I begin involving my children in family wealth discussions?

Financial education should begin early and progress with age-appropriate concepts. Young children learn basic principles like saving, compound interest, and charitable giving. By adolescence, heirs should gain exposure to investment fundamentals, business operations, and the responsibilities wealth creates. Rising generations should exercise increasing responsibility over time rather than receiving full authority suddenly upon inheritance. This graduated approach, beginning with observation, moving to bounded decision-making (such as a small investment or a foundation grant), and progressing to full stewardship, allows younger family members to develop the skills and judgment needed before they inherit capital.

​

What causes family conflict during wealth transfers?

Family conflict typically arises from competing ideas of fairness, sibling rivalries, and feelings of being overlooked or undervalued. Tension grows when family members lack understanding of the reasoning behind decisions, leaving assumptions to fill the gaps. Fidelity’s 2025 Family and Finance Study found that 52 per cent of parents have not disclosed their net worth to their adult children, and 68 per cent have not shared inheritance details. Yet 95 per cent of adult children say they feel ready to manage inherited wealth, while only 25 per cent of parents agree their children are prepared. Without transparent dialogue about both financial matters and core family values, trust can erode and miscommunication can seed lasting resentment. Recent research shows that only 27 per cent of Americans have actually discussed wealth transfer with family members, yet 71 per cent express comfort with the topic (Edward Jones, 2024).

​

How large is the coming generational wealth transfer, and how is it distributed?

The scale is exceptional. Capgemini’s World Wealth Report 2025 projects USD 83.5 trillion will transfer globally by 2048, with regional distribution of 61 per cent to the Americas, 25 per cent to EMEA, and 14 per cent to APAC (Capgemini, 2025). In the United States specifically, Cerulli Associates projects USD 124 trillion through 2048, with USD 105 trillion flowing to heirs and USD 18 trillion to charity. The transfer will be concentrated: USD 30.9 trillion comes from ultra-high-net-worth individuals over USD 5 million (by 2033); USD 5.8 trillion flows through Asia-Pacific (2023-2030). In the United States, women are projected to inherit approximately USD 47 trillion (about 56 per cent of the US transfer), to control a rising share of US household wealth by 2030, and they live several years longer than men on average (Cerulli Associates, 2024). The primary recipients are Gen X (ages 46 to 61 in 2026) followed by Millennials; by 2040, Gen X and Gen Z together will comprise the majority of ultra-high-net-worth individuals.

​

What is The Continuity Compact framework?

The Continuity Compact is a four-principle framework designed to transfer family wealth across generations without transferring conflict. The principles are: Govern (establish a family charter, council and clear decision rights before they are needed); Communicate (make intergenerational dialogue deliberate, regular and safe, as communication breakdown is the largest documented cause of failed transfers); Prepare (educate rising generations through early involvement and graduated responsibility, so heirs inherit capability alongside capital); and Endure (choose durable structures and a long-horizon stewardship relationship that survives any single generation or market cycle). This framework addresses the proven drivers of wealth transfer success and operationalises the findings of three decades of family wealth research.

​

How should a family council function?

A family council is a formalised governance body where family members meet regularly to discuss shared wealth, values, and decisions. Effective councils establish clear meeting schedules (typically quarterly to semi-annually), documented agendas, and transparent communication about both financial matters and family purpose. Research shows that regular, structured family meetings dramatically reduce misunderstanding and conflict. A family council also provides a safe forum for rising generations to learn about wealth stewardship before inheriting it, and it can make decisions about investment strategy, charitable giving, business operations, and family governance changes. The council amplifies the purpose of the family charter by putting it into practice. When professional facilitation is used, councils prove even more effective at navigating difficult conversations.

​

Why is long-term stewardship stability important in wealth planning?

Wealth transferred across generations faces multiple headwinds: market cycles, tax changes, business volatility, and shifts in family circumstance and values. Approximately 70 per cent of heirs change advisers during major wealth transitions, disrupting institutional memory and continuity (Cerulli Associates). A stable, long-horizon stewardship relationship with a trusted adviser or institution provides continuity that transcends any single market downturn or family transition. This stability allows a family to maintain strategy over decades, to educate and mentor rising generations without rushing, and to navigate crises with guidance from someone deeply familiar with the family’s history, values, and objectives. Families with committed, long-term adviser relationships experience significantly higher success rates in wealth preservation and intergenerational transfer.

​

What is “patient capital,” and how does it support multi-generational wealth?

Patient capital is capital committed to a multi-year or multi-decade investment horizon, where the investor is willing to forgo immediate returns in expectation of sustainable long-term appreciation. Private banks, endowments, sovereign wealth funds, and family offices exemplify patient capital providers. Patient capital is the opposite of the quarterly-earnings-driven mindset that dominates public financial institutions. Families stewarded by advisers committed to patient capital principles experience lower portfolio churn, better long-term returns, and greater emotional resilience through market cycles. The adviser’s willingness to hold assets through downturns and to resist the temptation to “prove oneself” by constant rebalancing becomes a form of risk management that shorter-horizon advisers cannot provide.

​

What is a Swiss private banker, and why does this legal status matter?

A Swiss private banker occupies a unique legal position under Swiss law. Private bankers are required to pledge their unlimited personal fortunes as collateral against loss of customer assets, and they are personally liable for their business obligations. This creates a fiduciary relationship of exceptional accountability: the banker’s own wealth is at stake alongside yours. Only a small number of banking institutions in Switzerland still fully qualify as genuine private bankers with unlimited partner liability, and Bordier & Cie is one of them. This legal standing reflects a governance model deliberately designed for long-term, intergenerational stewardship of family wealth.

​

How do trusts help with multi-generational wealth transfer?

A trust is a legal arrangement in which a trustee holds and manages assets on behalf of beneficiaries according to terms you set. For multi-generational planning, structures such as dynasty trusts can facilitate wealth transfer across decades while minimising taxes and protecting assets from beneficiaries’ creditors or from unwise personal decisions. Trusts allow you to define precisely who receives what, when, and under what conditions, providing continuity that outlasts any single generation. Paired with coordinated estate, tax, investment, and family governance planning, trusts form a durable backbone for long-horizon stewardship.

​

What role do women play in the coming generational wealth transfer?

In the United States, women are projected to inherit approximately USD 47 trillion (about 56 per cent of the intergenerational transfer by 2048) and to control a rising share of US household wealth by 2030 (Cerulli Associates, 2024). Women live several years longer than men on average, creating a 40 to 50 year wealth stewardship horizon. Yet women inheritors receive significantly less pre-inheritance communication and preparation than male heirs. UBS’s Own Your Worth 2025 study found that 1 in 3 women inheritors had no prior discussion about the transfer with their families, and 80 per cent of women who inherited faced unexpected challenges because they lacked adequate preparation. Families should develop gender-aware governance frameworks that account for longer wealth horizons, different philanthropic priorities, and the particular support women may need navigating inheritance without prior involvement in family financial decisions.

​

What should a family charter actually contain?

A family charter codifies a family’s vision, values and wealth philosophy, then translates them into concrete rules about who decides what, and when. In practice it typically includes sections on family vision and mission; principles governing wealth use and stewardship; criteria for family-member involvement in business or investment decisions; the roles and responsibilities of governance bodies such as a family council; policies on distributions, employment and education; procedures for admitting new members through marriage; and mechanisms for resolving disputes without litigation. It is not a binding legal instrument like a will or trust, but a framework for clarity and alignment. The discipline of writing one carries measurable returns: families with a constitution are twice as likely to rate communication effective and 1.5 times more likely to achieve effective joint decision-making (UBS & Agreus, 2025).

​

How often should a family council meet?

A family council is a formal forum, typically meeting one to four times per year, in which members across generations discuss the family’s financial affairs, values, long-term goals and potential disagreements. The cadence matters less than the consistency: what counts is a regular schedule chosen by the family, whether quarterly, semi-annually or annually, with an agenda drafted in advance and shared with all participants. The council should include members across at least two generations, separate financial discussions from relational ones, and maintain minutes that track action items between meetings. A Cerulli Associates (2024) survey found that 89 per cent of firms identify family meetings and regular communication as a key best practice for successful generational transitions, yet only 39 per cent of UK adults have discussed inheritance plans with their families at all (Brodies, 2024).

​

How should a family assign decision rights among its members?

Ambiguity about who holds authority in specific decisions is a common source of intergenerational friction, so a governance framework should assign decision rights explicitly. A multi-jurisdictional family might agree, through its charter, that the family council votes on distributions above a certain threshold while routine operational expenses are approved by an executive committee; that investment strategy is set by an investment committee including one younger-generation representative learning the role; that decisions about the family business require consensus among shareholders, with a defined dispute-resolution process if consensus fails; and that education and career policies are set by the council while individual career choices remain each member’s prerogative. These distinctions, seemingly simple, prevent disputes when circumstances change. Without them, a young heir may feel excluded, a retiring founder unheard, or siblings divided on risk. Clear protocols ensure disagreement does not become existential conflict.

​

When and how should heirs begin to be prepared?

Preparation works best as graduated involvement over years, not a one-time course. It should begin early, with age-appropriate concepts: young children learn saving, compound interest and charitable giving; by adolescence, heirs gain exposure to investment fundamentals and the responsibilities wealth creates. From early adulthood, structured observation gives way to contribution, often through a junior seat on an investment committee where the next generation observes decision-making, then contributes ideas, then gradually assumes accountability. Bounded, values-aligned entry points follow: leading a satellite portfolio, a smaller real-estate holding or a philanthropic initiative before stewarding core assets. This matters because inadequately prepared heirs account for 25 per cent of wealth transfer failures, yet only 23 per cent of next-generation members are fully or highly prepared to inherit (Williams Group, 2003; UBS & Agreus, 2025).

​

Can philanthropy or a family foundation be used to train the next generation?

Philanthropy is often overlooked as a preparation vehicle, yet it offers one of the safest contexts for learning real-world stewardship. A family foundation or giving account lets the next generation make autonomous decisions with meaningful money, observe consequences, build judgment and develop stakeholder-management skills, all within a bounded, values-aligned context. Consider a 25-year-old heir who has spent three years chairing a foundation’s grants committee: they have made discretionary awards, evaluated proposals, managed board dynamics and navigated disagreement about priorities, building decision-making muscle in a lower-stakes environment. Failure in a grant affects its recipients but not the family’s core capital. The same logic applies to involvement in an operating business. Ocorian (2024) found that 73 per cent of family offices now manage philanthropic efforts alongside wealth management, positioning family giving as governance infrastructure rather than an afterthought.

​

What particular challenges do women inheritors face?

In the United States, women are projected to inherit approximately USD 47 trillion, some 56 per cent of the transfer through 2048, and to control a rising share of United States household wealth by 2030 (Cerulli Associates, 2024). Living several years longer than men on average, they steward wealth over horizons of 40 to 50 years rather than the historical 25 to 30. Yet preparation frameworks rarely address their distinct position. UBS Own Your Worth (2025) found that one in three women inheritors had no prior conversation about the wealth with the transferor, and 80 per cent faced significant challenges navigating inheritance without a plan. Women are also more likely to inherit suddenly from a spouse than through planned business succession. The preparation gap reflects opportunity, not capability: the data show no significant cognitive gap, and families that develop female heirs with equal rigour close it entirely.

​

What is a Continuity Audit and why does it matter?

A Continuity Audit is a documented inventory of family wealth information, succession dependencies and institutional memory, maintained continuously and accessible to designated family members and fiduciaries. It comprises three components: a confidential digital-asset registry of accounts, access protocols and holdings, with the governance context of why each asset exists and who may modify it; a succession documentation portfolio of wills, trust deeds, charters and tax-planning documents, each with a one-page summary of the problem it solves and the assumptions behind it; and a where-everything-is inventory mapping advisers, document locations and governance bodies, typically 5 to 10 pages, updated annually. It matters because probate and estate filings in US state courts climbed roughly 32 per cent between 2020 and 2024, with information gaps a primary cause (IndexBox, 2025).

​

How do families lose institutional memory across generations?

When the keeper of family wealth information dies unexpectedly or experiences cognitive decline, knowledge can be lost permanently. Information loss encompasses more than account locations and access, which are themselves material. Families lose institutional context: the rationale for legacy holdings that an heir might otherwise liquidate on impulse; relationships with advisers whose understanding of the family took years to build; documented decisions and the principles that animated them; and the lessons embedded in prior transitions. A founder’s carefully assembled real-estate portfolio, built with specific long-term and tax-efficiency logic, can be dismantled by an heir who inherits the assets but not the reasoning. An offshore trust established decades ago for sound purposes can be wound down inappropriately if its purpose is not understood. The cost compounds at settlement: contested estates average 18 months to 3 years, with legal costs consuming 3 to 7 per cent of estate value.

​

How should a family choose between trusts, foundations and family investment companies?

The choice among these structures is not primarily about tax minimisation, though that matters; it is fundamentally about creating continuity of purpose. Trusts separate ownership from control through a legal deed, protecting assets from creditors, divorce and litigation while letting the settlor define rules that persist across generations; dynasty trusts, where permitted, can last indefinitely. Family investment vehicles such as holding companies and limited partnerships serve as institutional wrappers for long-term capital, retaining and reinvesting income rather than fragmenting it at each transition, and can create share classes that give younger members graduated exposure to governance. Family foundations embed wealth within a charitable mandate, transforming it into an enduring institution with its own governance and legal personality. Each reflects different priorities around control, flexibility and longevity. A well-drafted deed, charter or constitution becomes the family’s operating system, reducing renegotiation at every transition.

​

How should a family manage wealth and governance across multiple jurisdictions?

A family that moves across tax jurisdictions, relocates between regulatory environments, or disperses members across continents must establish governance that is both flexible enough to adapt to new jurisdictions and durable enough to survive the administrative and emotional complexity of migration. This is no longer rare: 142,000 high-net-worth individuals were projected to relocate in 2025, and wealth transfer and relocation, historically separate decisions, now often converge into a single high-stakes decision window (Henley & Partners, 2025). The family council that meets quarterly in Geneva is harder to sustain if adult children are in Mumbai, Dubai and New York, yet such a family cannot rely on informal governance: it needs written protocols, clear decision rights, and a steward who understands each jurisdiction. Anchoring to an institution present in each location preserves continuity of counsel where competitors with single-centre models face a costly handoff from zero.

​

Why do heirs so often change advisers at a transition, and how can a family avoid that cost?

When a founder passes or steps back, heirs face a critical juncture: they reassess the adviser, the investment approach, the fee structure and the alignment of values. According to Cerulli Associates (2024), 70 per cent of heirs switch advisers entirely during major transitions, yet only 27 per cent of future beneficiaries plan to retain their benefactor’s adviser. The hidden cost is steep: a new adviser needs months to understand the family’s history, the composition of capital, embedded tax strategies, and the family’s true risk tolerance. Knowledge is lost and the portfolio becomes vulnerable to churn. The remedy is relationship before crisis. An heir who has met the family’s bankers, lawyers and trustees before needing them, and who knows the adviser as a person, is far more likely to retain them. This transforms the relationship from personal dependency into institutional continuity.

​

How does a neutral facilitator help with difficult family conversations?

Family dynamics often prevent parents and children from hearing each other clearly without mediation. An experienced facilitator, whether a family psychologist, trusted adviser or governance specialist, ensures that conversations do not become lectures, that all voices are heard, and that emotional triggers do not derail the dialogue. The need is widely felt but rarely met: RBC Wealth Management (2025) found that 65 per cent of wealth givers and 94 per cent of wealth receivers want professional help facilitating inheritance conversations, yet fewer than one-third of families have asked for it. A neutral chair also manages discussion in the family council, maintaining the psychological safety that allows difficult topics, differing values, prior divorces, unequal inheritance, to surface in dialogue rather than erupt during a crisis. The presence of such a facilitator is one of the dimensions the Continuity Index scores under the Communicate pillar.

​

How does a family transmit its values, not only its capital?

Many heirs inherit the capital but not the purpose. A family may have built wealth through patient, long-horizon thinking yet communicate this only tacitly, and an heir who believes wealth is primarily for personal consumption will steward it very differently from one who sees it as a vehicle for legacy and continuity. Family councils and charters serve an educational purpose alongside their governance function: they are forums in which values are articulated and tested. A young heir who participates in deliberate discussion of “what we believe our wealth is for” internalises the family’s culture, so that when inheritance arrives they are executing a vision they helped build rather than deciding from scratch. A long-tenured private banker contributes too, holding documented knowledge of family values and the reasons certain holdings exist. This alignment reduces post-inheritance conflict and strengthens the likelihood that stewardship continues across generations.

​

What is the difference between confidentiality and trust?

Confidentiality is a product; trust is a relationship, and the distinction is also the distinction between a vendor and a steward. A private bank’s smaller size, long-standing relationships and family ownership create conditions for genuine confidentiality that large diversified institutions cannot match: a banker whose own reputation and personal wealth depend on discretion, and whose firm has no obligation to chase new assets or media visibility, operates under fundamentally different incentives around information-sharing. Family governance structures, succession plans and sensitive personal circumstances can then be discussed with minimal risk of leakage. But discretion alone is not the relationship. As Grégoire Bordier has reflected, “we thought that secrecy was a key selling point, but today we see that we were wide off the mark. Trust is the central factor in the relationship between clients and their bank.” For a family planning across generations, candid planning rests on trust, with confidentiality as its precondition.

​

Why does a long-horizon institution outperform a single adviser for continuity?

Because a private bank is engineered to outlast any single person, the institution itself becomes a stable reference point for a family across generations. The relationship is not with a portfolio manager who changes employers, but with an institutional framework: a specific office, settled governance, and a documented house approach to risk and discretion. A solo adviser, however able, introduces a single point of failure, retirement ends continuity, where an institution that plans for its own succession sustains the relationship across transitions. Over a 50-year generational span, equities will crash multiple times, currencies will move 30 to 40 per cent, and tax laws will shift; an institution carries the memory of how the family weathered each. Bordier & Cie’s survival across 182 years and five generations, with a Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of around 30 per cent and a debt-free balance sheet, demonstrates that institutional structures designed to outlast any single cycle are what endurance requires (Bordier & Cie, 2026).